Which type of monitoring review is designed to catch issues as they arise?

The correct answer is concurrent review, which is specifically designed to identify and address issues as they occur in real-time. This type of monitoring takes place during ongoing processes, allowing compliance officers and healthcare providers to evaluate the effectiveness and adherence to policies and regulations while patient care and administrative activities are still in progress.

By implementing concurrent reviews, organizations can quickly detect deviations from compliance standards or established procedures, enabling timely interventions. This proactive approach helps to mitigate risks before they escalate into more significant issues that could lead to penalties or harm to patients.

In contrast, retrospective reviews analyze past events and data, which do not provide the immediate insights needed to address current problems. Random sampling, while useful in certain contexts, does not ensure consistent monitoring and could miss ongoing issues if they fall outside the selected sample. Document reviews typically focus on static information that has already been generated, which may not reflect current issues or practices. Each of these alternatives addresses different aspects of monitoring but lacks the immediacy and responsiveness inherent in concurrent reviews.