Which of the following is a benefit of conducting a Control Self-Assessment?

The selection of "increases scope" as the benefit of conducting a Control Self-Assessment is valid because self-assessments enable organizations to broaden their understanding of compliance and risk management areas. By involving staff in evaluating their own controls and processes, an organization can identify both strengths and weaknesses across a greater range of operations. This comprehensive approach allows for a more thorough analysis of how well existing controls are functioning.

Additionally, when different teams participate in the self-assessment process, they can provide insights that may not typically surface during traditional audits, resulting in a wider scope of oversight. Expanding the assessment scope can lead to the discovery of non-compliance issues or areas for improvement that may have been overlooked, ultimately enhancing the organization’s overall compliance posture.

In contrast, the other options either imply limitations on the auditing process or do not capture the core advantage of self-assessments. For instance, increasing report generation may simply reflect more documentation rather than a deeper look into compliance processes. Reducing overall audit frequency does not align with the purpose of self-assessment, which is to foster ongoing compliance and risk management. Finally, streamlining external audits suggests a focus on reducing effort rather than enhancing the comprehensive understanding of controls. Thus, the emphasis on expanding