Which of the following is a common type of evidence collected for compliance violations?

Documentary evidence is a common type of evidence collected for compliance violations because it refers to written or recorded materials that can substantiate claims or allegations regarding a violation. This evidence can include contracts, emails, audit reports, policies, procedure documents, and any relevant correspondence that provides concrete proof of compliance or non-compliance with regulations and policies.

Collecting documentary evidence is crucial for effective compliance investigations as it helps ensure an objective evaluation of the facts surrounding the situation. It offers a clear historical record and aids in establishing a timeline of events or actions taken. Such documentation is often necessary to demonstrate whether an organization is adhering to regulatory standards, policies, and procedures, making it a vital component of compliance assessments.

While other types of evidence may provide additional context or perspectives regarding compliance issues, they typically lack the objective and verifiable nature of documentary evidence. For example, personal testimonials might offer insight into experiences related to compliance but can be subjective and unverifiable without supporting documents. Similarly, graphic representations or social media reviews may illustrate perceptions or effects of compliance issues but do not provide the concrete proof required in formal investigations.