Which of the following can result in automatic disqualification of a relator from filing a qui tam action?

The option that leads to automatic disqualification of a relator from filing a qui tam action is primarily tied to whether another individual has previously filed the same claim. Qui tam actions are designed to encourage whistleblowing on fraud against the government, specifically in cases involving federal funds. When a relator, or whistleblower, files a claim, it triggers the court to evaluate if the same allegations have already been reported. If another individual files the same claim first, this essentially bars subsequent relators from bringing identical claims, as the legal principle of "first to file" applies in such cases.

Additionally, prior legal issues may complicate or affect a relator's standing, but they do not automatically disqualify a person. Employment status within the organization can also present challenges, particularly if the relator is a current employee, as this might raise questions about motives and the legitimacy of the claims being made. However, it does not categorically lead to disqualification.

Thus, the combination of having another individual file the same claim first constitutes the primary reason for disqualification, while the existence of prior legal issues and current employment may create complications or barriers. Therefore, the answer reflects the valid consideration regarding the first-to-file rule and its implications in qui tam