Which of the following can help reduce the risk of a qui tam lawsuit?

Expanding contemporaneous reviews can help reduce the risk of a qui tam lawsuit because it involves regularly and systematically evaluating transactions and practices as they occur, rather than waiting for the end of a process. This proactive approach allows for the identification and corrective actions on potentially non-compliant behavior in real-time.

By continuously monitoring operations and compliance efforts, organizations are better positioned to detect issues before they escalate into legal problems. It demonstrates a commitment to compliance and ethical standards, which can be a deterrent to whistleblowers and qui tam actions, as it indicates that the organization is diligently working to uphold regulations and correct any missteps promptly.

The other options, while they may play a role in compliance strategies, do not directly contribute to the same proactive responsiveness that contemporaneous reviews offer. Conducting random audits can provide insight but may not capture issues in a timely manner. Limiting documentation can lead to gaps in compliance evidence, which could actually increase risk. Relying solely on external consultations might create a detachment from the daily operations and specific challenges facing the organization, which means that internal issues could go unaddressed until they result in problems.