When anticipating what the government will measure during a compliance program review, which of the following should you consider?

The correct choice emphasizes the importance of comprehensively understanding the resources necessary to effectively demonstrate the compliance program's success. When undergoing a compliance program review, it is crucial to consolidate all relevant resources, including staff training, processes in place, monitoring systems, and documentation, that can provide evidence of compliance efforts and effectiveness. This holistic perspective allows for better preparation and insight into what auditors or reviewers may need to see to assess the compliance program accurately.

By evaluating all resources required, organizations can ensure they are equipped to showcase the program's impact and highlight any areas of improvement. This integrated approach recognizes that compliance is not just about following rules but also about creating a culture of compliance that is supported by adequate resources.

In contrast, focusing only on past audits could lead to an incomplete view, as compliance needs evolve over time. Considering specific financial performance metrics alone does not encompass the broader scope of compliance, which extends beyond mere financial aspects. Lastly, while public perception is important for reputation management, it is generally not a direct measure of compliance effectiveness and would not capture the intricacies involved in actual compliance program assessments.