What is required for an "addressable" implementation specification?

The correct choice highlights the flexibility offered by "addressable" implementation specifications. This term is commonly used within the context of regulations such as HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), which outlines standards for protecting sensitive patient information.

An "addressable" implementation specification means that an organization must assess whether it is reasonable and appropriate to implement the specification as it is presented. If the organization determines that it is not reasonable to follow the specification precisely, it must consider alternative measures that can achieve the same outcome or level of protection for the information in question. This approach recognizes that different organizations may have varying capacities, resources, and contexts that could affect how they comply with regulation while still ensuring the necessary protections are in place.

This understanding is important because it emphasizes the need for each organization to engage in a risk assessment process and make informed decisions about how best to meet compliance obligations tailored to their specific circumstances. Thus, option A correctly articulates that organizations have the responsibility to either implement the specification as stated or find an equivalent alternative that meets the regulatory goals.