What is one consequence for providers who fully cooperate during an OIG self-disclosure?

When providers fully cooperate during an Office of Inspector General (OIG) self-disclosure process, one of the significant consequences is the potential for lower settlement amounts. This cooperation can demonstrate goodwill and a commitment to compliance, which the OIG often views favorably.

By being proactive and transparent about compliance issues, providers may be able to negotiate a reduced fine or settlement, as the OIG is likely to take this cooperation into account when determining penalties. It reflects an organization's willingness to rectify issues and contribute to a culture of compliance, which may lead to more favorable terms during resolution of the matter.

In the context of the other provided options, higher fines and longer review times are typically associated with non-cooperation or unaddressed compliance issues, while increased demand for services does not directly relate to the outcome of a self-disclosure process.