True or False: Expanding contemporaneous reviews to include retrospective reviews is beneficial for providers.

Expanding contemporaneous reviews to include retrospective reviews is beneficial for providers because it allows for a more comprehensive understanding of practices and outcomes. Contemporaneous reviews focus on evaluating practices at the time services are delivered, while retrospective reviews analyze the same practices after the fact. Together, they provide a fuller picture of compliance and quality of care.

The integration of both review types can help identify patterns over time, uncovering areas for improvement that may not be visible through contemporaneous reviews alone. For instance, retrospective reviews can reveal trends in documentation errors or compliance failures that occurred previously, enabling providers to make informed adjustments to processes and training. This dual approach can enhance patient care, reduce risks of non-compliance, and bolster a provider's reputation by demonstrating a commitment to continuous improvement.

Providers who utilize both contemporaneous and retrospective reviews can therefore strengthen their compliance programs, thereby reaping the benefits associated with improved operational effectiveness and quality management.