In an informed consent, which statement is appropriate when a Pet scan is deemed non-billable?

The statement that a subject may be responsible for costs outside normal standards of care is appropriate in the context of informed consent for a PET scan deemed non-billable. This reflects the ethical obligation to inform participants about potential financial responsibilities they may incur when participating in a study or undergoing procedures that are not typically covered by insurance.

In cases where a PET scan or other procedure falls outside the accepted billing practices—often categorized as experimental or investigational—patients need to be made aware that they might bear the financial burden. This transparency ensures that subjects can make an informed decision about their participation, understanding all aspects, including possible costs they might not expect.

Understanding that subjects might be held liable for expenses that exceed normal standards of care underscores the principle of informed consent, where individuals must receive comprehensive information regarding both risks and financial implications of the care involved.