After identifying non-systemic billing errors, what should be done next?

The correct choice emphasizes the importance of continued monitoring after identifying non-systemic billing errors. This approach is critical in ensuring that similar errors do not recur in the future, as ongoing oversight helps to identify trends and patterns that could indicate broader issues or deficiencies in billing practices. By continuing to monitor the matter, the healthcare organization can implement corrective actions or corrective education for staff, verify compliance with policies, and enhance overall billing procedures to prevent future occurrences of the same errors.

This strategy aligns with best practices in healthcare compliance, which prioritize proactive management of billing processes to maintain financial integrity and avoid potential penalties or audits. Monitoring allows organizations to respond dynamically to changes in billing practices and ensure adherence to regulatory requirements.

In contrast, self-reporting and repayment alone without further testing does not address potential systemic issues that could lead to repeated errors. Testing from years back carries risks, as it may lead to unnecessary expenditures or complications. Finally, stating there’s insufficient information to make a decision does not provide actionable steps needed to build a strong compliance framework in response to the identified errors. Overall, the choice to monitor ensures a robust and responsible compliance approach.